< back | February 15th, 2006 | forward >
Naomi [userpic]

Olympic losers / Olympic winners

February 15th, 2006 (12:10 pm)

The Olympic Loser's Site got started back in 2004 covering the Summer Games. I was checking the Winter Olympics coverage last night when I suddenly got curious about something, and paged back through the summer coverage to see if I could find it.

One of the points that the keeper of the blog makes repeatedly is that the "loser" at the Olympics, most of the time, does a heck of a lot better than the overwhelming majority of really fine athletes could (and certainly better than 99.9% of the people reading the site could).

The loser of the men's 400 metre in 2004 was Abdulla Mohamed Hussein of Somalia. He had the slowest heat time, 51.52 seconds. The winner's final time was 44 seconds.

The loser of the men's 100 metre was Sultan Saeed of the Maldives, who finished in 11.72 seconds. The winner's time was 9.85 seconds.

At the first modern Olympic games, in 1896, an American runner named Tom Burke was the winner of both the 100m and 400m events. His time in the 100m was 12.0 seconds. His time in the 400 metres was 58.4 seconds in the preliminary heats, and 54.2 seconds in the final.

(And for those who are looking at Tom's last name and wondering if there's a family connection: why yes, in fact, which is why I know about him. I think Tom was Ed's grandfather's uncle, or something like that.)

Tom also acted as the starter for the first Boston Marathon. Apparently no one thought to bring a starter pistol, so Tom drew a line in the dirt with the heel of his boot, had the runners line up, and yelled "Bang!"

Naomi [userpic]

Library Cards

February 15th, 2006 (12:14 pm)

At what age should I get Molly her own library card?

I know she'd love the idea of having her OWN, for the same reason that she gets a huge thrill out of handing over cash at Target for her own purchases. But right now, I have my library card number memorized, making it pretty quick and efficient to log in to the Minneapolis Library web site and renew my books online. And they have it set up with an e-mail to remind me when books are coming due, which is great. If I got Molly her own library card, I would not consider it fair to make her responsible for paying her own overdue fines, since she's five, and relies on me for transportation.

Molly having her own card would be a genuine hassle.

But she'd think it was really neat. And I feel guilty for denying her this milestone of independence, especially since she's started reading.

Thoughts?

< back | February 15th, 2006 | forward >